4.8 Article

Self-Assembled Copper Amino Acid Nanoparticles for in Situ Glutathione AND H2O2 Sequentially Triggered Chemodynamic Therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages 849-857

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b08714

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0405400]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81471784, 51872094]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015023]
  4. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51725202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoformulations that can respond to the specific tumor microenvironment (TME), such as a weakly acidic pH, low oxygen, and high glutathione (GSH), show promise for killing cancer cells with minimal invasiveness and high specificity. In this study, we demonstrate self-assembled copper-amino acid mercaptide nanoparticles (Cu-Cys NPs) for in situ glutathione-activated and H2O2-reinforced chemodynamic therapy for drug resistant breast cancer. After endocytosis into tumor cells, the Cu-Cys NPs could first react with local GSH, induce GSH depletion, and reduce Cu2+ to Cu+. Subsequently, the generated Cu+ would react with local H2O2 to generate toxic hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH) via a Fenton-like reaction, which has a fast reaction rate in the weakly acidic TME, that are responsible for tumor-cell apoptosis. Due to the high GSH and H2O2 concentration in tumor cells, which sequentially triggers the redox reactions, Cu-Cys NPs exhibited relatively high cytotoxicity to cancer cells, whereas normal cells were left alive. The in vivo results also proved that Cu-Cys NPs efficiently inhibited drug-resistant breast cancer without causing obvious systemic toxicity. As a novel copper mercaptide nanoformulation responsive to the TME, these Cu-Cys NPs may have great potential in chemodynamic cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available