4.8 Article

Temperature-Sensitive Structure Evolution of Lithium-Manganese-Rich Layered Oxides for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 140, Issue 45, Pages 15279-15289

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b07858

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51622202, U1507107, 21503009, 21603009]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0104302]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [KZ201610005003]
  4. Guangdong Science and Technology Project [2016B010114001]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office
  6. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cathodes of lithium-rich layered oxides for high-energy Li-ion batteries in electrically powered vehicles are attracting considerable attention by the research community. However, current research is insufficient to account for their complex reaction mechanism and application. Here, the structural evolution of lithium-manganese-rich layered oxides at different temperatures during electrochemical cycling has been investigated thoroughly, and their structural stability has been designed. The results indicated structure conversion from the two structures into a core-shell structure with a single distorted-monoclinic LiTMO2 structure core and disordered-spinel/rock salt structure shell, along with lattice oxygen extraction and lattice densification, transition- metal migration, and aggregation on the crystal surface. The structural conversion behavior was found to be seriously temperature sensitive, accelerated with higher temperature, and can be effectively adjusted by structural design. This study clarifies the structural evolution mechanism of these lithium-rich layered oxides and opens the door to the design of similar high-energy materials with better cycle stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available