4.8 Article

Mechanical Deformation Distinguishes Tunneling Pathways in Molecular Junctions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 141, Issue 1, Pages 497-504

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b11248

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CHE-1708173]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BA 1799/3-1]
  3. DFG [INST 40/467-1 FUGG]
  4. NSF through the MRSEC program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing a clearer understanding of electron tunneling through molecules is a central challenge in molecular electronics. Here we demonstrate the use of mechanical stretching to distinguish orbital pathways that facilitate tunneling in molecular junctions. Our experiments employ junctions based on self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of homologous alkanethiols (CnT) and oligophenylene thiols (OPTn), which serve as prototypical examples of sigma-bonded and pi-bonded backbones, respectively. Surprisingly, molecular conductances (G(molecule)) for stretched CnT SAMs have exactly the same length dependence as unstretched CnT SAMs in which molecular length is tuned by the number of CH2 repeat units, n. In contrast, OPTn SAMs exhibit a 10-fold-greater decrease in G(molecule) with molecular length for stretched versus unstretched cases. Experiment and theory show that these divergent results are explained by the dependence of the molecule-electrode electronic coupling Gamma on strain and the spatial extent of the principal orbital facilitating tunneling. In particular, differences in the strain sensitivity of Gamma versus the repeat-length (n) sensitivity can be used to distinguish tunneling via delocalized orbitals versus localized orbitals. Angstrom-level tuning of interelectrode separation thus provides a strategy for examining the relationship between orbital localization or delocalization and electronic coupling in molecular junctions and therefore for distinguishing tunneling pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available