4.6 Article

Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized phase 2a clinical trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 1013-1021

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.059

Keywords

biologics; biomarkers; EASI; IGA; pruritus; T(H)2; topical corticosteroids

Categories

Funding

  1. MedImmune, a AstraZeneca Group
  2. Amgen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tezepelumab (AMG 157/MEDI9929), a first-in-class monoclonal antibody, targets thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a cytokine that is implicated in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in adults with moderate to severe AD. Methods: In this phase 2a study (NCT02525094), 113 patients were randomized 1: 1 to subcutaneous tezepelumab 280 mg or placebo every 2 weeks, plus class 3 topical corticosteroids (TCS). The primary endpoint was the week 12 response rate for a >= 50% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI50). Secondary endpoints including EASI75, Investigator's Global Assessment, SCORAD 50, SCORAD 75, pruritus numeric rating and 5-D itch scales, and exploratory endpoints (including EASI90) were assessed at weeks 12, and 16 (post hoc). Results: A numerically greater percentage of tezepelumab plus TCS-treated patients achieved EASI50 (64.7%) versus placebo plus TCS (48.2%; P = .091). Numerical improvements over placebo were demonstrated for week 12 secondary and exploratory endpoints, with further improvements at week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Limitations: Greater than expected response rates in placebo-treated patients were possibly attributable to TCS. Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, numerical improvements over placebo for all week 12 endpoints were demonstrated, with greater week 16 responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available