4.6 Article

Androgens in women Androgen-mediated skin disease and patient evaluation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages 1497-1506

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.062

Keywords

acne; androgenetic alopecia; androgen receptor; androgens; combined oral contraceptive; congenital adrenal hyperplasia; dutasteride; female pattern hair loss; finasteride; flutamide; hirsutism; polycystic ovary syndrome; spironolactone

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Androgens are produced throughout the body in steroid-producing organs, such as the adrenal glands and ovaries, and in other tissues, like the skin. Several androgens are found normally in women, including dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and androstenedione. These androgens are essential in the development of several common cutaneous conditions in women, including acne, hirsutism, and female pattern hair loss (FPHL)-androgen-mediated cutaneous disorders (AMCDs). However, the role of androgens in the pathophysiology of these diseases is complicated and incompletely understood. In the first article in this Continuing Medical Education series, we discuss the role of the skin in androgen production and the impact of androgens on the skin in women. Specifically, we review the necessary but insufficient role that androgens play in the development of acne, hirsutism, and FPHL in women. Dermatologists face the challenge of differentiating physiologic from pathologic presentations of AMCDs in women. There are currently no dermatology guidelines outlining the indications for endocrinologic evaluation in women presenting with acne, hirsutism, or FPHL. We review the available evidence regarding when to consider an endocrinologic workup in women presenting with AMCDs, including the appropriate type and timing of testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available