4.6 Article

Peak oxygen uptake measured during a perceptually-regulated exercise test is reliable in community-based manual wheelchair users

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 701-707

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1522941

Keywords

Oxygen consumption; RPE; disability; exercise testing; test-retest reliability

Categories

Funding

  1. Loughborough University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares test-retest reliability and peak exercise responses from ramp-incremented (RAMP) and maximal perceptually-regulated (PRETmax) exercise tests during arm crank exercise in individuals reliant on manual wheelchair propulsion (MWP). Ten untrained participants completed four trials over 2-weeks (two RAMP (0-40 W + 5-10 W . min(-1)) trials and two PRETmax. PRETmax consisted of five, 2-min stages performed at Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) 11, 13, 15, 17 and 20). Participants freely changed the power output to match the required RPE. Gas exchange variables, heart rate, power output, RPE and affect were determined throughout trials. The (V) over dot O-2peak from RAMP (14.8 +/- 5.5 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)) and PRETmax (13.9 +/- 5.2 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)) trials were not different (P = 0.08). Measurement error was 1.7 and 2.2 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1) and coefficient of variation 5.9% and 8.1% for measuring (V) over dot O-2peak from RAMP and PRETmax, respectively. Affect was more positive at RPE 13 (P = 0.02), 15 (P = 0.01) and 17 (P = 0.01) during PRETmax. Findings suggest that PRETmax can be used to measure (V) over dot O-2peak in participants reliant on MWP and leads to a more positive affective response compared to RAMP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available