4.3 Article

Sensitive voltammetric determination of bromate by using ion-exchange property of a Sn(II)-clinoptilolite-modified carbon paste electrode

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 143-157

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-018-4119-4

Keywords

Response surface area (RSM); Zeolite-modified electrodes; Clinoptilolite; Nanoparticles; Bromate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A modified carbon paste electrode with Sn(II)-exchanged clinoptilolite nanoparticles (CNP-Sn(II)-CPE) showed voltammetric current (in cyclic voltammetry (CV)) for Sn(II)/Sn(IV) in sulfuric acid electrolyte (pH 2). The peak current was decreased when bromate was added to the solution. Hence, this decrease was used for indirect voltammetric determination of bromate. In designed experiments using response surface methodology (RSM) approach in square-wave voltammetry (SqW), strong acidic pH values (pH 1.8-2.5) caused an increased SqW voltammetric response, because such pH values bring sufficient Sn(II) as the electroactive species at the electrode surface via ion-exchange process. The optimal variables obtained are sulfuric acid as supporting electrolyte at pH 1.80, modifier% at 25, amplitude at 498.4mV, step potential at 5.4mV, and frequency at 25Hz. The peak current of Sn(II)/Sn(IV) redox pair was inversely proportionate to the concentration of bromate. Hence, I (difference in peak current in the absence and presence of bromate) was proportionally increased with increasing the concentration of bromate in the range of 5.00 to 100.00molL(-1) with a detection limit of 0.06molL(-1) bromate. The effect of some strong oxidizing agents was studied, and the results showed that when such agents are present at levels of 2.5 to 5 times greater than the bromate in the solution, they can cause a maximum error of 3% in the determination of bromate in sulfuric acid electrolyte at pH 2.5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available