4.6 Article

Partition of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn among mineral particles during their sorption in soils

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 1775-1787

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2184-z

Keywords

Ferrihydrite; Metal; Smectite; Soil; Sorption

Funding

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Office [NKFIH K105009]
  2. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Heterogeneity of soil mineral particles may lead to the misinterpretation of bulk sorption data on their role in metal sorption, which may be resolved through the direct observation of metal distribution among the soil particles after the sorption. Materials and methods Analytical transmission electron microscopy was used to study metal (Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn) sorption characteristics of clay minerals, Fe-oxyhydroxides and their natural assemblages in soils with contrasting pH under single element and competitive situations. Results and discussion Iron-oxyhydroxides sorbed higher metal amounts than clay mineral particles mostly, and the sorption capacity of the latter phases were more affected by competition. Iron-oxyhydroxide particles acted as effective metal sorbents in soils not only as individual particles but also as coatings on other mineral particles, and the structural Fe in clay minerals may also resulted in higher metal sorption in some cases. Besides the direct observation of metal sorption onto soil mineral particles, metal precipitates could be identified directly, and the role of organic surfaces in metal sorption could be inferred indirectly in certain cases. Conclusions Comparison of metal affinity sequences and their partition characteristics between the bulk soil and different mineral particles were found to be an effective tool to specify the most active mineral components in metal sorption at given soil and sorption condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available