4.3 Article

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: is it worth reattaching the tuberosities?

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 437-444

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.025

Keywords

Proximal humeral fractures; reverse shoulder prosthesis; tuberosity nonunion; malunion or migration; complications; elderly patient

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) may he indicated in displaced proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. We hypothesized that tuberosity fixation and healing around the prosthesis would result in better outcomes and patient satisfaction. Methods: Thirty-eight acute displaced or dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures in elderly patients were treated with reattachment of the tuberosities around a RSA. The mean age at surgery was 80 +/- 4 years (range, 70-88 years). A specific reverse fracture stem that incorporated a cancellous bone autograft (harvested from the fractured head) and a standardized suturing technique for tuberosity fixation were used in all operations. Patients were evaluated and radiographed with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 36 +/- 8 months). Results: The tuberosity union rate was 84% (32 of 38). There were 4 tuberosity resorptions and 2 tuberosity migrations with nonunion, which were associated with significantly lower subjective results (Subjective Shoulder Value of 65% vs. 83%, P= .029) and lower active mobility in forward elevation (115 degrees +/- 26 degrees vs. 141 degrees +/- 25 degrees P = .023) and external rotation (11 degrees +/- 12 degrees vs. 27 degrees +/- 12 degrees, P = .010). Among the 5 disappointed patients, 3 presented with tuberosity resorption and 2 with tuberosity migration and nonunion. Conclusions: Despite the advanced age of the patients, tuberosity reattachment and use of bone graft results in a high rate of tuberosity healing. Tuberosity reconstruction and healing in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fractures improves active forward elevation, external rotation, and patient satisfaction. (C) 2018 The Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available