4.8 Article

Effect of Phosphorus-Doping on Electrochemical Performance of Silicon Negative Electrodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 7125-7132

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b00386

Keywords

lithium-ion battery; negative electrode; silicon; phosphorus doping; morphology; crystallinity; phase transition

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [24350094, 15K21166]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K21166, 14J11485] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of phosphorus (P)-doping On the electrochemical performance of Si negative electrodes in lithium ion batteries was investigated. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy was used to Observe changes in surface morphology. Surface crystallinity and the phase transition of Si negative electrodes before and after a charge-discharge cycle were investigated by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Li insertion energy into Si was also; calculated based on computational chemistry. The results showed that-a low P concentration of 124 ppm has a meaningful influence on the electrochemical properties of a Si negative electrode; the cycle performance is improved by 13,-doping of Si. P-doping suppresses the changes in the surface morphology of a Si negative electrode and the phase transition during a charge-discharge cycle. Li insertion energy increases with an increase in the P concentration; Li insertion into P-doped Si is energetically unfavorable, which indicates that the crystal lattice of Si shrinks as a result of the replacement of some Si atoms with smaller P atoms, and therefore, it is more difficult to insert Li into P-doped Si. These results reveal that suppression of the phase transition reduces the large change in the volume of Si and prevents a Si negative electrode from disintegrating, which helps to improve the otherwise poor cycle performance of a Si electrode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available