4.8 Article

Cage-Type Highly Graphitic Porous Carbon-Co3O4 Polyhedron as the Cathode of Lithium Oxygen Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 2796-2804

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b11252

Keywords

metal-organic frameworks; catalytic graphitization; thermal stability; cage-type; graphitic carbon-Co3O4; lithium oxygen battery

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [26708028]
  2. Japanese-Taiwanese Cooperative Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. Canon Foundation
  4. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University through International Research Group [IRG-14-40]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel cage-type highly graphitic porous carbon Co3O4 (GPC Co3O4) polyhedron was designed and successfully prepared for the first time by executing a twostep annealing of core shell structured metal organic frameworks (MOFs). The low graphitic carbon cores were selectively removed during the secondary annealing in air atmospheres, leaving the interior voids due to their lower thermal stability compared with the graphitic carbon shells. Inspired by the unique properties of the cage-type GPC Co3O4 polyhedron, GPC Co3O4 was assembled as an oxygen electrode for a rechargeable Li-O-2 battery without the additional conductive agent. The efficient generation of Li202 during discharging and the reversible decomposition of Li202 during charging were clearly observed by XRD patterns and SEM images. The GPC Co3O4 polyhedron integrates the beneficial properties, including high electronic conductivity, the rigid cage-type structure consisting of the mesoporous walls and interior void space, as well as the uniformly embedded catalytically active Co3O4 nanoparticles. As a result, the GPC Co3O4 cathode displays a low charge overpotential of 0.58 V, a good rate capability, and a long cycle life in a Li-O-2 battery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available