4.8 Article

Structural, electrochemical and Li-ion transport properties of Zr-modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 positive electrode materials for Li-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 410, Issue -, Pages 45-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.094

Keywords

Li-ion battery; Ni-rich cathode; Zirconium doping; Zirconates coating; Li-ion diffusion; Direct current polarization

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. US National Science Foundation [1355438]
  3. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We modify a nickel-rich layered LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) positive electrode material by substituting the transition metals with Zr to mitigate its structural instability and capacity degradation. We show that Zr, over a concentration range of 0.5-5.0 at.%, can simultaneously reside on and expand the lattice of NCM811 and form Li-rich lithium zirconates on their surfaces. In particular, Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)(0.99)Zr0.01O2 (1% Zr-NCM811) exhibits the best rate capability among all the compositions in this study. It shows higher cycling durability than the raw NCM811 at both low and high current density lithiation and de-lithiation. According to X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry measurements, the 1% Zr-NCM811 sample is more chemically/electrochemically stable than the raw. In addition to comparing the diffusivities in the coin-cell measurements, we demonstrate that Zr modification can facilitate Li-ion diffusion in the NCM811 balk material by direct current polarization measurements. The superior performance of Zr-NCM811 results from the lattice expansion induced by Zr doping and the presence of ion-conducting lithium zirconates partially coated on the surface of Zr-NCM811 particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available