Journal
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL
Volume 51, Issue 50, Pages -Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aaecf2
Keywords
control landscapes; quantum control; quantum systems
Categories
Funding
- DOE [DE-FG02-02ER15344]
- Army Research Office [W911NF-16-1-0014]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper is a rebuttal of the comment by Zhdanov (2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.) with regard to our paper (Russell et al 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 205302). Parts of the comment either misrepresent the original claims in Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 205302) or consider issues that go beyond the scope of Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 205302). We address all of these points in the rebuttal. A remaining item about the prospect of an accumulation of null sets was already considered in a prior work (Russell et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 335103). Importantly, the comment fails to consider the vast and continually growing set of successful quantum control tests under well-defined conditions, which serves as foundational evidence for the results in Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 205302). In summary, the remarks in the comment either misconstrue the claims of Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 205302) or raise points that are irrelevant to the goal of the original work. Thus, we conclude that the primary claim of the original paper stands: almost all closed finite dimensional quantum systems are trap free given adequate control resources.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available