4.8 Article

Physisorption of Water on Graphene: Subchemical Accuracy from Many-Body Electronic Structure Methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 358-368

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03679

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt foundation within the Feodor-Lynen program
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions/ERC [616121]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, US Air Force [FA8655-12-1-2099]
  4. ARCHER UK National Supercomputing Service, United Kingdom CarParrinello (UKCP) consortium [EP/F036884/1]
  5. London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London (UCL) Research Computing, Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  6. IT4Innovations Center of Excellence [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0070, LM2015070]
  7. UK Materials and Molecular Modelling Hub
  8. EPSRC [EP/P020194/1]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [715594]
  10. EPSRC [EP/P020194/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wet carbon interfaces are ubiquitous in the natural world and exhibit anomalous properties, which could be exploited by emerging technologies. However, progress is limited by lack of understanding at the molecular level. Remarkably, even for the most fundamental system (a single water molecule interacting with graphene), there is no consensus on the nature of the interaction. We tackle this by performing an extensive set of complementary state-of-the-art computer simulations on some of the world's largest supercomputers. From this effort a consensus on the water-graphene interaction strength has been obtained. Our results have significant impact for the physical understanding, as they indicate that the interaction is weaker than predicted previously. They also pave the way for more accurate and reliable studies of liquid water at carbon interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available