4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Surgical treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism: Results from 500 pancreatectomies in neonates and children

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 27-32

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.030

Keywords

Congenital hyperinsulinism; Pancreatectomy; Localized islet nuclear enlargement; Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome; Insulinoma; Multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1 (MEN1)

Funding

  1. NIH [R37 DK056268, R01 DK098517]
  2. Goldsmith Foundation
  3. Congenital Hyperinsulinism International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Congenital Hyperinsulinism (HI) causes severe hypoglycemia in neonates and children. We reviewed our experience with pancreatectomy for the various types of HI. Methods: From 1998 to 2018,500 patients with HI underwent pancreatectomy: 246 for focal HI, 202 for diffuse HI, 37 for atypical HI (16 for Localized Islet Nuclear Enlargement [LINE], 21 for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome), and 15 for insulinoma. Focal HI neonates were treated with partial pancreatectomy. Patients with diffuse HI who failed medical management underwent near-total (98%) pancreatectomy. Atypical HI patients had pancreatectomies tailored to the PET scan and biopsy findings. Results: The vast majority of pancreatectomies for focal HI were < 50%, and many were 2%-10%. 97% of focal HI patients are cured. For diffuse disease patients, 31% were euglycemic, 20% were hyperglycemic, and 49% required treatment for hypoglycemia; the incidence of diabetes increased with long-term follow-up. All 15 insulinoma patients were cured. Conclusions: Our approach to patients with focal HI can distinguish focal from diffuse HI, localize focal lesions, and permit partial pancreatectomy with cure in almost all focal patients. Surgery does not cure diffuse disease but can help prevent severe hypoglycemia and brain damage. Surgery can be curative for insulinoma and for some cases of atypical HI. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available