4.5 Article

Misinformation in Online Social Networks: Detect Them All with a Limited Budget

Journal

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/2885494

Keywords

Algorithms; Experimentation; Performance; Misinformation detection; monitor placement; online social networks

Funding

  1. NSF [CCF-1422116, 0953284]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0953284] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Online social networks have become an effective and important social platform for communication, opinions exchange, and information sharing. However, they also make it possible for rapid and wide misinformation diffusion, which may lead to pernicious influences on individuals or society. Hence, it is extremely important and necessary to detect the misinformation propagation by placing monitors. In this article, we first define a general misinformation-detection problem for the case where the knowledge about misinformation sources is lacking, and show its equivalence to the influence-maximization problem in the reverse graph. Furthermore, considering node vulnerability, we aim to detect the misinformation reaching to a specific user. Therefore, we study a tau-Monitor Placement problem for cases where partial knowledge of misinformation sources is available and prove its #P complexity. We formulate a corresponding integer program, tackle exponential constraints, and propose a Minimum Monitor Set Construction (MMSC) algorithm, in which the cut-set(2) has been exploited in the estimation of reachability of node pairs. Moreover, we generalize the problem from a single target to multiple central nodes and propose another algorithm based on a Monte Carlo sampling technique. Extensive experiments on real-world networks show the effectiveness of proposed algorithms with respect to minimizing the number of monitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available