4.6 Article

Combined contribution of Cu-rich precipitates and retained austenite on mechanical properties of a novel low-carbon medium-Mn steel plate

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 3438-3454

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-3021-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674080]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0304105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simultaneous improvement in yield strength, ductility and impact toughness has always been a challenge for structural steels. In the attempt to achieve this goal, we proposed a Cu-precipitation-strengthened low-carbon medium-Mn steel in the present study. Upon aging at 600 degrees C for 1h, a considerable amount of Cu-rich precipitates with average radius of 6.3nm was uniformly distributed in the tempered martensitic matrix. An ultra-high yield strength, therefore, was attained by the strong interaction of Cu-rich precipitates with dislocations. In addition to the precipitation strengthening effect, the introduction of Cu also dramatically promoted the dissolution of cementite particles and formation of retained austenite at triple junctions or other high-angle grain boundaries. Compositional analysis of cementite and retained austenite was conducted by atom probe tomography. Austenite formation removed Mn segregation from the grain boundaries, consumed brittle cementite particles, and hence eliminated intergranular fracture, leading to a remarkable improvement in toughness. Moreover, a volume fraction of 23.2% retained austenite with appropriate mechanical stability also enabled the steel to be more ductile. The optimal mechanical properties, yield strength of 1005MPa, tensile strength of 1070MPa, total elongation of 24.3% and room temperature impact energy of 73J were obtained, through the cumulative contribution of Cu-rich precipitates and retained austenite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available