4.6 Article

Common but differentiated flexible MIL-53(Al): role of metal sources in synthetic protocol for tuning the adsorption characteristics

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 6174-6185

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-03287-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777119]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17230711600]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018TJPT0017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The property tuning of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has been an active pursuit in both academia and industry. In this work, structural properties of a promising flexible MOF, MIL-53(Al), were finely tuned via a metal source-based synthetic protocol. Varying degrees of framework flexibility and hydrophilicity have been achieved using water-insoluble metal sources, such as alumina, aluminum hydroxide, boehmite, and traditional aluminum nitrate for synthesis. MIL-53(Al) prepared from alumina was the most rigid and hydrophilic as is confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction, vapor adsorption, and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy. Magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance results revealed that utilizing insoluble metal sources entailed different reaction mechanisms during MOF synthesis and introduced uncoordinated carboxyl into the framework. Through selection of metal sources, the adsorption characteristics of MIL-53(Al) were successfully tuned. The samples prepared from insoluble metal sources showed increased adsorption capacities toward iodine and bisphenol A. The maximum capacity toward iodine in water and n-hexane was one and six times higher than that of conventional MIL-53(Al), respectively. This finding offers excellent prospects for the structural regulation and property tuning of MOFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available