4.5 Review

Thermal stability study of transition metal perovskite sulfides

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 24, Pages 4135-4143

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2018.419

Keywords

calorimetry; crystal growth; S

Funding

  1. USC Viterbi School of Engineering Startup Funds
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-16-1-0335]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-2411]
  4. Link Foundation Energy Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metal perovskite chalcogenides, a class of materials with rich tunability in functionalities, are gaining increased attention as candidate materials for renewable energy applications. Perovskite oxides are considered excellent n-type thermoelectric materials. Compared to oxide counterparts, we expect the chalcogenides to possess more favorable thermoelectric properties such as lower lattice thermal conductivity and smaller band gap, making them promising material candidates for high temperature thermoelectrics. Thus, it is necessary to study the thermal properties of these materials in detail, especially thermal stability, to evaluate their potential. In this work, we report the synthesis and thermal stability study of five compounds, -SrZrS3, -SrZrS3, BaZrS3, Ba2ZrS4, and Ba3Zr2S7. These materials cover several structural types including distorted perovskite, needle-like, and Ruddlesden-Popper phases. Differential scanning calorimeter and thermogravimetric analysis measurements were performed up to 1200 degrees C in air. Structural and chemical characterizations such as X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and energy dispersive analytical X-ray spectroscopy were performed on all the samples before and after the heat treatment to understand the oxidation process. Our studies show that perovskite chalcogenides possess excellent thermal stability in air at least up to 550 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available