4.5 Article

Influence of substrate effects in magnetic and transport properties of magnesium ferrite thin films

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 469, Issue -, Pages 643-649

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.08.065

Keywords

MgFe2O4; Thin films; Magnetism; Photoconductivity; Transport

Funding

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation of the Republic of Argentina [57052290, DA13/02 MINCYT]
  3. DFG in Germany [SFB 762]
  4. Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory-LNLS [PGM-20160228, XAFS2-20160122]
  5. CONICET [PIP 908, PIP 585]
  6. ANPCyT, Argentina [PICT 2013-2616, PICT 2016-3356]
  7. PICT [2016-3356]
  8. PIP [585]
  9. SNMAG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to study the substrate influence in Mg ferrite properties, thin films were simultaneously grown by DC magnetron sputtering on different substrates (MgO (1 0 0) and SrTiO3 (1 0 0)). In both cases samples show high values of saturation magnetization and Curie temperatures above room temperature. While in the case of the sample grown on MgO the hysteresis loops indicate the existence of more than one ferrimagnetic component and lower value of remanence to saturation ratio, the deposited one on SrTiO3 is mono-component and has a rectangular-shape magnetic loop at all temperatures below 300 K. The difference is attributed to different microstructures due to the misfit strain caused by the different lattice constants between substrates and ferrite. The electric transport and photoconductivity properties have been investigated on both samples. Thin film growth on STO presents an increase around 40% of the photoconductance in the near UV range. The photocurrent shows two clear onsets that coincide with the indirect and direct band gaps of STO indicating the important role of this substrate in the generation of photo carriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available