4.7 Article

Higher Frequency of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Intake in Bullous Pemphigoid Patients than in the French General Population

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages 835-841

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.045

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have been suspected to induce bullous pemphigoid (BP). The objective of this study was to compare the observed frequency of gliptin intake in a large sample of 1,787 BP patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 in France, with the expected frequency after indirect age standardization on 225,412 individuals extracted fromthe database of the NationalHealthcare Insurance Agency. The secondary objectivewas to assess the clinical characteristics and the course of gliptin-associated BP, depending on whether gliptin was continued or stopped. The observed frequenciesof intakeof thewhole gliptin class and that of vildagliptin inthe BP population were higher than those in the general population after age standardization (whole gliptin class: 6.0%; 95% confidence interval = 4.9e7.1% vs. 3.6%, observed-to-expected drug intake ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.4-2.0; P < 0.0001; vildagliptin = 3.3%; 95% confidence interval = 2.5-4.1% vs. 0.7%, ratio = 4.4; 95% confidence interval = 3.5-5.7; P < 0.0001). The association of any gliptinthornmetformin was also higher than in the general population, ratio = 1.8 (95% confidence interval = 1.3-2.4; P< 0.0001). Gliptin-associated BP had no specific clinical characteristics. Gliptin was stopped in 48 (45.3%) cases. Median duration to achieve disease control, rate, and delay of relapse were not different whether gliptin was stopped or continued. This study strongly supports the association between gliptin intake, particularly vildagliptin, and the onset of BP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available