4.4 Article

Novel correlation coefficients for hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to supplier selection and medical diagnosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 6427-6441

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-181393

Keywords

Correlation coefficient; hesitant fuzzy sets; decision making; supplier selection; medical diagnosis

Funding

  1. State Scholarship Fund of China [201706690025]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71521001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71601066, 71501056, 71501054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hesitant fuzzy set theory provides an effective technique for researchers and engineers to cope with vagueness and uncertainty. In recent years, to explore the correlation between hesitant fuzzy sets, traditional correlation measure in statistics has been constantly studied in hesitant fuzzy environments. In this study, extant studies of correlation measures in hesitant fuzzy contexts are recalled and analyzed. In view of the forgoing analysis, we find out that the extant correlation coefficients have some limitations. Moreover, a few correlation coefficients are not in line with the traditional definition of correlation coefficients. In order to address the flaws of the existing proposals, a novel hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient is proposed in this study. The new proposal of this study can not only overcome the flaws of the old hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficients, but it also shows several desirable characteristics. The weighted form of the newly defined correlation coefficient and its features are also investigated. Finally, three numerical examples concerning supplier selection and medical diagnosis are examined using the developed correlation coefficients to demonstrate their applicability. Comparison analyses with existing proposals highlight the efficiency of our proposals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available