4.5 Article

Assessment of Bamboo Charcoal/Nano-TiO2 (BC/TiO2) Composite Material and Its Application in Photocatalytic Coating

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10904-018-01054-3

Keywords

Nano-TiO2; Photocatalytic; Bamboo charcoal; Coating

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672108, 51602126]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFB0303505]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures (Wuhan University of Technology), China [SYSJJ2018-12]
  4. University of Jinan Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622118, XBH1716]
  5. 111 Project of International Corporation on Advanced Cement-based Materials [D17001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bamboo charcoal/nano-TiO2 (BC/TiO2) composite material is designed and prepared for further improving photocatalytic property of TiO2. Assessment of BC/TiO2 composite material and its application in photocatalytic coating are investigated by nitrogen absorption test, scanning electron microscopy-energy disperse spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) characterization and photocatalytic and mechanical properties analysis. The results show that optimal ratio of TiO2 to BC is 0.03. Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation ratio can reach 62.9% under 4h UV light irradiation, which is 43.7% higher than pure TiO2 sample. The specific surface area (S-BET) and the total average pore size ((D) over bar) of BC/TiO2 can reach 388.33m(2)/g and 3.71nm, respectively. Moreover, the photocatalytic coatings prepared mainly by BC/TiO2 and polyacrylic emulsion (PAE), not only show satisfactory mechanical properties, but also have excellent photocatalytic property. When the addition of BC/TiO2 composite materials is 6%, the photocatalytic property of coating is optimal, RhB degradation ratio can reach 83.7% under 8h UV light irradiation. Also the adhesion, pencil hardness and impact resistance reach 2 level, 2H and 44kgcm, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available