4.7 Article

Torque Teno Virus for Risk Stratification of Acute Biopsy-Proven Alloreactivity in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 219, Issue 12, Pages 1934-1939

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz039

Keywords

immunologic monitoring; kidney transplantation; torque teno virus; rejection

Funding

  1. Medical Scientific Fund of the Major of the City of Vienna [17058]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [KLI 604-B31]
  3. Anniversary Fund of the Osterreichische Nationalbank [17197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Drug-induced immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients is crucial to prevent allograft rejection, but increases risk for infectious disease. Immunologic monitoring to tailor immunosuppressive drugs might prevent alloreactivity and adverse effects simultaneously. The apathogenic torque teno virus (TTV) reflects the immunocompetence of its host and might act as a potential candidate for a holistic monitoring. Methods. We screened all 1010 consecutive patients from the prospective Vienna Kidney Transplant Cohort Study for availability of allograft biopsies and adequately stored sera for TTV quantification by polymerase chain reaction. Results. Patients with acute biopsy-proven alloreactivity according to the Banff classification (n = 33) showed lower levels of TTV in the peripheral blood compared to patients without rejection (n = 80) at a median of 43 days before the biopsy. The risk for alloreactivity decreased by 10% per log level of TTV copies/mL (risk ratio, .90 [95% confidence interval, .84-.97]; P = .005). TTV levels >1 x 10(6) copies/mL exclude rejection with a sensitivity of 94%. Multivariable generalized linear modeling suggests an independent association between TTV level and alloreactivity. Conclusions. TTV is a prospective biomarker for risk stratification of acute biopsy-proven alloreactivity in kidney transplant recipients and might be a potential tool to tailor immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available