4.7 Article

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation provides effective salvage despite refractory disease or failed prior autologous transplant in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a CIBMTR analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-018-0696-z

Keywords

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; Allogeneic transplantation; GVL effects

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24-CA076518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. NHLBI [5U10HL069294]
  5. NCI
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH250201200016C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0039, N00014-14-1-0028]
  8. Actinium Pharmaceuticals
  9. Allos Therapeutics, Inc.
  10. Amgen, Inc.
  11. Ariad
  12. Be the Match Foundation
  13. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
  14. Celgene Corporation
  15. Chimerix, Inc.
  16. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  17. Fresenius-Biotech North America, Inc.
  18. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture Ltd.
  19. Genentech, Inc.
  20. Gentium SpA
  21. Genzyme Corporation
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Health Research, Inc.
  24. Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  25. HistoGenetics, Inc.
  26. Incyte Corporation
  27. Jeff Gordon Children's Foundation
  28. Kiadis Pharma
  29. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  30. Medac GmbH
  31. Medical College of Wisconsin
  32. Merck Co, Inc.
  33. Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Co.
  34. Milliman USA, Inc.
  35. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  36. National Marrow Donor Program
  37. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  38. Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
  39. Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.
  40. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  41. Perkin Elmer, Inc.
  42. Remedy Informatics
  43. Sanofi US
  44. Seattle Genetics
  45. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  46. Soligenix, Inc.
  47. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  48. StemCyte, A Global Cord Blood Therapeutics Co.
  49. Stemsoft Software, Inc.
  50. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  51. Tarix Pharmaceuticals
  52. TerumoBCT
  53. Teva Neuroscience, Inc.
  54. THERAKOS, Inc.
  55. University of Minnesota
  56. University of Utah
  57. Wellpoint, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data on the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). Using the CIBMTR registry, we report here the outcomes of AITL patients undergoing an allo-HCT.MethodsWe evaluated 249 adult AITL patients who received their first allo-HCT during 2000-2016.ResultsThe median patient age was 56years (range=21-77). Majority of the patients were Caucasians (86%), with a male predominance (60%). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was predominantly calcineurin inhibitor-based approaches while the most common graft source was peripheral blood (97%). Median follow-up of survivors was 49months (range=4-170months). The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute GVHD at day 180 were 36% (95% CI=30-42) and 12 (95% CI=8-17), respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1year was 49% (95%CI 43-56). The 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19% (95% CI=14-24), while the 4-year relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 21% (95% CI=16-27), 49% (95% CI=42-56), and 56% (95% CI=49-63), respectively. On multivariate analysis, chemoresistant status at the time of allo-HCT was associated with a significantly higher risk for therapy failure (inverse of PFS) (RR=1.73 95% CI=1.08-2.77), while KPS <90% was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (inverse of OS) (RR=3.46 95% CI=1.75-6.87).ConclusionOur analysis shows that allo-HCT provides durable disease control even in AITL patients who failed a prior auto-HCT and in those subjects with refractory disease at the time of allografting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available