4.6 Article

Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women's Health Initiative Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 235-242

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4696-z

Keywords

Garvan; fracture; osteoporosis; FRAX; fracture risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN268201600018C, HHSN268201600001C, HHSN268201600002C, HHSN268201600003C, HHSN268201600004C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundGuidelines recommend fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women aged 50-64, but the optimal method is unknown.ObjectivesTo compare discrimination and calibration of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Garvan fracture risk calculator for predicting fractures in postmenopausal women aged 50-64 at baseline.DesignProspective observational study.ParticipantsSixty-three thousand seven hundred twenty-three postmenopausal women aged 50-64years participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study and Clinical Trials.Main MeasuresIncident hip fractures and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) during 10-year follow-up. Calculated FRAX- and Garvan-predicted hip fracture and MOF fracture probabilities.Key ResultsThe observed 10-year hip fracture probability was 0.3% for women aged 50-54years (n=14,768), 0.6% for women aged 55-59years (n=22,442), and 1.1% for women aged 60-64years (n=25,513). At sensitivity thresholds 80%, specificity of both tools for detecting incident hip fracture during 10years of follow-up was low: Garvan 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.3-31.0%) and FRAX 43.1% (95% CI 42.7-43.5%). At maximal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC(c), 0.58 for Garvan, 0.65 for FRAX), sensitivity was 16.0% (95% CI 12.7-19.4%) for Garvan and 59.2% (95% CI 54.7-63.7%) for FRAX. At AUC(c) values, sensitivity was lower in African American and Hispanic women than among white women and lower in women aged 50-54 than those 60-64years old. Observed hip fracture probabilities were similar to FRAX-predicted probabilities but greater than Garvan-predicted probabilities. At AUC(c) values (0.56 for both tools), sensitivity for identifying MOF was also low (range 26.7-46.8%). At AUC(c) values (0.55 for both tools), sensitivity for identifying any clinical fracture ranged from 18.1 to 34.0%.ConclusionsIn postmenopausal women aged 50-64years, the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculator discriminate poorly between women who do and do not experience fracture during 10-year follow-up. There is no useful threshold for either tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available