Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors
David B. Resnik et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2016)
The End of Proof? The Integration of Different Mathematical Cultures as Experimental Mathematics Comes of Age
Henrik Kragh Sorensen
MATHEMATICAL CULTURES (2016)
A Core-Item Reviewer Evaluation (CoRE) System for Manuscript Peer Review
Adedayo A. Onitilo et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2014)
Why and how mathematicians read proofs: further evidence from a survey study
Juan Pablo Mejia-Ramos et al.
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS (2014)
Mathematical Proofs in Practice: Revisiting the reliability of published mathematical proofs
Joachim Frans et al.
THEORIA-REVISTA DE TEORIA HISTORIA Y FUNDAMENTOS DE LA CIENCIA (2014)
Reliability of Reviewer Ratings in the Manuscript Peer Review Process: An Opportunity for Improvement
Adedayo A. Onitilo et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2013)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review
Carole J. Lee
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2012)
The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal
Jeffrey L. Jackson et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors
Douglas P. Newton
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2010)
Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study
Lutz Bornmann et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2006)
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
PM Rothwell et al.
BRAIN (2000)