4.4 Article

Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination in Goat Milk Powder Using PacBio Single Molecule Real-Time Sequencing and Droplet Digital PCR

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 81, Issue 11, Pages 1791-1799

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-535

Keywords

Bacterial contamination; Droplet digital PCR; Goat milk powder; Pacific Biosciences single molecule real-time sequencing

Funding

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-36]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31660450]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Goat milk powder is a nutritious and easy-to-store product that is highly favored by consumers. However, the presence of contaminating bacteria and their metabolites may significantly affect the flavor, solubility, shelf life, and safety of the product. To comprehensively and accurately understand the sanitary conditions in the goat milk powder production process and potential threats from bacterial contamination, a combination of Pacific Biosciences single molecule real-time sequencing and droplet digital PCR was used to evaluate bacterial contamination in seven goat milk powder samples from three dairies. Ten phyla, 119 genera, and 249 bacterial species were identified. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Lactococcus, and Cronobacter were the primary genera. Bacillus cereus, Lactococcus lactis, Alkaliphilus oremlandii, and Cronobacter sakazakii were the dominant species. With droplet digital PCR, 6.3 x 10(4) copies per g of Bacillus cereus and 1.0 x 10(4) copies per g of Cronobacter spp. were quantified, which may increase the risk of food spoilage and the probability of foodbome illness and should be monitored and controlled. This study offers a new approach for evaluating bacterial contamination in goat milk powder and supplies a reference for the assessment of food safety and control of potential risk, which will be of interest to the dairy industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available