4.6 Article

Systematic Comparison of Reduced Tube Current Protocols for High-pitch and Standard-pitch Pulmonary CT Angiography in a Large Single-center Population

Journal

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 619-627

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.003

Keywords

Pulmonary CT angiography; reduced tube current protocol; high-pitch CT acquisition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale and Objectives: Benefits of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms combined with dose reduction techniques have been shown at computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in several medium to small patient collectives. In this study, we performed a systematic comparison of image quality to combinations of reduced tube current (RC) and IR for both standard-pitch (SP) single source and high-pitch (HP) dual-source CTPA in a large, single-center population. Materials and Methods: Three hundred eighty-two consecutive patients (October 2010 through December 2012) received clinically indicated CTPA with one of four consecutively changed protocols: (1) HPSC: 180 mAs, weighted filtered back projection, pitch = 3; (2) HPRC: 90 mAs, IR, pitch = 3; (3) SPSC: 180 mAs, weighted filtered back projection, pitch = 1.2; and (4) HPRC: 90 mAs, IR, pitch = 1.2. Tube potential was 100 kV. Vascular attenuation and standardized signal-to-noise ratio (sSNR) were measured in the pulmonary trunk (sSNR(PT)) and on segmental artery level (sSNR(S1), sSNR(S10)). Dose-length product was recorded per series. Two independent investigators rated image quality. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and kappa statistics were used for statistical analysis. Median values are presented per group. Results: Image quality was consistent between all groups (observer 1: P = 0.118; observer 2: P = 0.122). Inter-reader consistency was very good (kappa = 0.866, P < 0.001). Dose-length-product was significantly reduced in HP and RC groups (P < 0.001 for each; SPSC: 139.5 mGycm; HPRC: 92 mGycm; SPSC: 211 mGycm; HPRC: 137 mGycm). sSNR was comparable (sSNR(PT) overall: P = 0.052; sSNR(S1) overall: P = 0.161; and sSNR(S10) overall: P = 0.259). Conclusions: Substantial dose reduction can be within a routine clinical setting without quantifiable loss of image quality either by HP pulmonary angiography or by a combination of IR and RC in either HP or SP acquisition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available