4.4 Article

Identification of bacteria in juice/lettuce using magnetic nanoparticles and selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD AND DRUG ANALYSIS
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 575-584

Publisher

FOOD & DRUG ADMINSTRATION
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.09.006

Keywords

Food matrixes; Mass spectrometry; Magnetic nanoparticles; Pathogen; Selected reaction monitoring

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China [MOST-106-2113-M-259 -006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ensuring food safety requires a rapid and reliable method for detecting food-borne pathogens. Mass spectrometry has been demonstrated as a powerful tool to classify pure bacterial species. However, matrix interference from food backgrounds may lead to false results because of the suppression of microbial signals. It is useful to develop a method for bacterial enrichment and marker identification in food samples. Magnetic zirconia nanoparticles were used to concentrate spiked microorganisms from apple juice/lettuce under specific conditions (pH 4.5). Bacterial identification was achieved using nanoLC-MS. Selected reaction monitoring of bacteria-related peptides was applied for the first time to identify bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. This study presents an accurate means for bacterial identification in food matrixes using MS. The analysis time is less than 90 min and the minimum concentration of E. coli detected was 5 x 10(3) CFU/mL. The interaction between bacteria and the magnetic nanoparticles was electrostatic and nonspecific, in contrast to immunoassays which require specific antibodies. The targeted peptide analysis focuses on the bacterial markers, thus significantly simplifying the analysis and leading to an accurate identification of bacteria. Copyright (C) 2018, Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available