4.6 Article

Housing and health: new evidence using biomarker data MAS

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 256-262

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2018-211431

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/L009153/1]
  2. ESRC [ES/M008592/1]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council
  4. ESRC [ES/M008592/1, ES/L009153/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The link between housing and health is well established and long-standing, however much of the evidence relies on self-reported health measures. While these are useful, the availability of biomarker data allows us to add to this evidence using objective indicators of health. Methods In this paper, we use C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker associated with infection and stress, alongside information relating to housing details, demographic characteristics and health behaviours taken from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Hierarchical linear regression models estimate CRP for individual housing characteristics, and all available housing characteristics, controlling for confounders. Results Results indicate that housing tenure, type, cost burden and desire to stay in current home are associated with CRP. Private renters have significantly higher (worse) CRP than owners with a mortgage. In terms of housing type, respondents living in detached homes had lower CRP than those in semidetached or terraced houses, or those living in flats. Housing cost burden is associated with lower CRP, although further analysis indicates that this is the case only for low-income renters. Desire to stay in current home is significantly associated with higher CRP. Conclusions A number of housing characteristics were associated with CRP. These results further support an important role for housing in health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available