4.2 Article

Evaluation of the secondary structures of protein in the extracellular polymeric substances extracted from activated sludge by different methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 128-136

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.12.003

Keywords

Activated sludge; Different extraction methods; Extracellular polymeric substances; Protein secondary structure

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2017ZX07106003-002, 2017ZX07102004-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The changes of protein secondary structures in the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) extracted from activated sludge by four different methods were studied by analyzing the amide I region (1700-1600 cm(-1)) of the Fourier transform infrared spectra and model protein test. The results showed the molecular weight distribution of organic matter extracted by centrifugation, heating and cation exchange resin (CER) was similar, while the EPS extracted by centrifugation (Control) and CER had similar fluorescent organic matter. The protein secondary structures of extracted EPS by the four methods were different. The similarities of protein secondary structures between the EPS extracted by CER with the Control were the highest among the four extracted EPS. Although the EPS yield extracted by formaldehyde + NaOH method were the highest, its protein secondary structures had the lowest similarity with those extracted by the Control. Additionally, the effects of centrifugation and CER extraction on the secondary structures of bovine serum albumin were also lower than that of other extraction processes. CER enables the second maximum extraction of EPS and maximum retention of the original secondary structure of proteins. (C) 2018 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available