4.6 Article

Proteomics of acquired pellicle in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with or without erosive tooth wear

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 64-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.007

Keywords

Acquired enamel pellicle; Erosive tooth wear; Gastroesophageal reflux; Proteomics

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2014/26606-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This in vivo study compared the protein profile of the acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) in volunteers 1) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive tooth wear (ETW) (BEWE >= 9; GE group); 2) with GERD without ETW (BEWE = 0; GNE group) and 3) control (without GERD and BEWE = 0; C group). Materials and methods: Twenty-four subjects (8/group) participated. AEP was formed during 120 min and collected. After protein extraction, the samples were submitted to reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Label-free proteomic quantification was performed using Protein Lynx Global Service software. Results: In total, 458 proteins were identified. Seventy-six proteins were common to all the groups. The proteomic profile of the AEP was quite different among the distinct groups. The numbers of proteins exclusively found in the C, GE and GNE groups were 113, 110 and 81, respectively. Most of the proteins exclusively identified in the C and GNE groups bind metals, while those in the GE group are mainly membrane proteins. Many proteins were found exclusively in the reflux groups. In the quantitative analyses, when the GNE group was compared with the GE group, the proteins with the highest decreases were Lysozyme C, Antileukoproteinase, Cathepsin G, Neutrophil defensins and Basic salivary proline-rich proteins, while those with the highest increases were subunits of Hemoglobin, Albumin and isoforms of Cystatin. Conclusion: Profound alterations in the proteomic profile of the AEP were seen in GNE compared with GE volunteers, which might play a role in the resistance to ETW seen in the first.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available