4.6 Article

Non-thermal production of Dark Matter after inflation

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/020

Keywords

dark matter theory; inflation

Funding

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie: RISE InvisiblesPlus [690575]
  2. ITN Elusives [674896]
  3. Universidad Antonio Narino [2017239, 2018204]
  4. Spanish MINECO [FPA2017-84543-P]
  5. Department of Science and Technology, India through INSPIRE faculty fellowship [IFA 15 PH-130, DST/INSPIRE/04/2015/000110]
  6. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India [09/093(0169)/2015 EMR-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The existence of Dark Matter (DM) has been well established from various cosmological and astrophysical evidences. However, the particle properties of DM are largely undetermined and attempts to probe its interactions with the Standard Model (SM) particles have, so far, not met with any success. The stringent constraints on the DM-SM interactions, while does not exclude the standard lore of producing weakly massive interacting particle DM candidates through thermal freeze-out mechanism in its entirety, have certainly cast shadow on the same. In this work, we consider non-thermal production of DM within a simple extension of the SM including an inflaton field and a scalar DM candidate. Assuming negligible interactions between the SM particles and the DM, we study the production of the latter at the end of inflation, during the (p)reheating epoch. In this context, we explore the role of DM self-interactions and its interaction with the inflaton field, and find that DM can be over produced in a significant region of the parameter space. We further demonstrate that large self-interaction of the DM can suppress its abundance during preheating and to a certain extent helps to achieve the observed relic abundance via cannibalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available