4.4 Article

Optimization of stratification scheme for a fishery-independent survey with multiple objectives

Journal

ACTA OCEANOLOGICA SINICA
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages 154-169

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13131-015-0739-z

Keywords

fishery-independent survey; optimization; stratified random sampling; stratification scheme; computer simulation

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean [201305030]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120132130001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fishery-independent surveys are often used for collecting high quality biological and ecological data to support fisheries management. A careful optimization of fishery-independent survey design is necessary to improve the precision of survey estimates with cost-effective sampling efforts. We developed a simulation approach to evaluate and optimize the stratification scheme for a fishery-independent survey with multiple goals including estimation of abundance indices of individual species and species diversity indices. We compared the performances of the sampling designs with different stratification schemes for different goals over different months. Gains in precision of survey estimates from the stratification schemes were acquired compared to simple random sampling design for most indices. The stratification scheme with five strata performed the best. This study showed that the loss of precision of survey estimates due to the reduction of sampling efforts could be compensated by improved stratification schemes, which would reduce the cost and negative impacts of survey trawling on those species with low abundance in the fishery-independent survey. This study also suggests that optimization of a survey design differed with different survey objectives. A post-survey analysis can improve the stratification scheme of fishery-independent survey designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available