4.7 Article

Inexpensive and non-fluorinated superhydrophobic concrete coating for anti-icing and anti-corrosion

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 541, Issue -, Pages 86-92

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.014

Keywords

Superhydrophobic; Concrete coating; Mechanical strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51605078, 21774051]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of NSFC [51621064]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS) [2017QNRC001]
  4. Aviation Science Fund [2017ZE63012]
  5. EPSRC project [EP/N024915/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/N024915/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reinforced concrete is widely used in civil engineering due to its outstanding mechanical properties and low cost. However, icing and corrosion on concrete-based facilities such as roads, dams, and bridges often cause safety issues. Superhydrophobic surface with completely water-repellent properties that are inspired by the lotus leaf in nature, has great potential to solve this problem, however, most state-of-the-art and commercial superhydrophobic coatings are expensive and weak in mechanical robustness for large-scale application on concrete. Here, we developed an inexpensive, non-fluorinated, and robust superhydrophobic concrete (S-concrete) coating with a contact angle of 160 +/- 1 degrees and sliding angle of 6.5 +/- 0.5 degrees. This coating had a high surface mechanical strength and retained superhydrophobicity after blade scratch for several times or sandpaper abrasion for 20 m distance. The robust S-concrete coating also had a good anti-icing ability, a low deicing force, and a high corrosion resistance, which is expected to be applied on roads, buildings, bridges, and many other concrete-based facilities in large scale for anti-icing and anti-corrosion purposes. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available