4.7 Article

Co-treatment of hazardous wastes by the thermal plasma to produce an effective catalyst

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 243-251

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.069

Keywords

Medical waste; Fly ash; Plasma gasification; Slag; Catalyst; Secondary fly ash

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21707087, 21477071]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13078]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16DZX2260601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past two years, a pilot-scale plasma gasification was carried out. With the help of this project, we investigated the possibility to recycle plasma gasification-derived slag as an effective catalyst by adjusting co-treatment ratio between medical waste and fly ash. As a result, when the co-treatment ratio of fly ash increased, the derived slag showed a bigger content of transition metal, together with a higher activity for selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide. Specifically, the co-treatment slag with a best activity removed 64.4% of nitric oxide (1000 ppm) at 250 degrees C, 23.5% higher than the slag from single treatment of medical waste. On the other hand, almost all zinc (15.85-16.99 mg/g) and plumbum (0.72-1.16 mg/g) from raw materials were enriched in the secondary fly ash. Hence, if the secondary fly ash was treated by the plasma gasification again, these heavy metals would obtain further enrichments, which transformed the secondary fly ash into a potential resource for metallurgy. The main result of this work indicated a proper co-treatment of hazardous wastes by the plasma gasification produced high value-added products. The plasma gasification was a zero discharge technology for the treatment and recycle of various hazardous wastes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available