4.7 Article

How does the industry mobility affect pollution industry transfer in China: Empirical test on Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Porter Hypothesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 105-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.147

Keywords

Industry mobility; Pollution Haven effect; Innovation compensation effect; Mediation model

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [14BJL084]
  2. Research Innovation Funds of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics [2018110308]
  3. Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project of Shanghai [2018BJL005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollution Haven hypothesis and Porter hypothesis provide two different behavioral strategies for pollution industries under stringent environmental regulations, which make a clear line between the two hypotheses in the previous literature. This paper studies the pollution industry transfer in China from the perspective of industry mobility, and proves that the transfer of pollution industries under environmental regulations is the comprehensive effect of Pollution Haven and Innovation Compensation by using Chinese provincial-level data from 2000 to 2015. The empirical results find that strongly mobile pollution industries have tended to transfer directly to the areas with loose regulations, but Innovation Compensation effect is not significant, leading to the pollution industries transferring out; the weakly mobile pollution industries have not shown the Pollution Heaven effect, environmental regulations will stimulate innovation and increase industry output through the mechanism of Innovation Compensation, which increases the regional proportion of pollution industries output. In short, we believe this study can provide a new perspective for explaining the current pollution industry transfer in China and help for more precise and reasonable environmental policies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available