4.6 Article

Development and validation of a method for quantification of two tobacco-specific nitrosamines in indoor air

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1580, Issue -, Pages 90-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.10.037

Keywords

Tobacco-specific nitrosamines; Validation; Accuracy profile; Environmental aerosol; Tobacco heating system; e-Cigarette

Funding

  1. Philip Morris International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive and accurate method for the quantification of 1'-Demethy1-1'-nitrosonicotine (NNN) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in indoor air was developed and validated. To this aim, a novel approach for the collection of two tobacco-specific nitrosamines, using silica sorbent cartridges followed by simplified sample preparation and isotope dilution liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, was applied. This procedure led to a substantial improvement in terms of sensitivity and sample throughput as compared with methods using conventional trapping. For the validation, a matrix-based approach using an accuracy profile procedure was selected. The evaluated matrices were background air samples, environmental aerosols of a heat-not burn tobacco product (Tobacco Heating System [THS] 2.2, commercialized under the brand IQOS (R)), a rechargeable electronic cigarette (Solaris (R) and the environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) of a conventional cigarette (Marlboro Gold (R)). The method showed excellent recoveries, sensitivity, and precision. The limits of detection of the method for NNN and NNK were 0.0108 ng/m(3) and 0.0136 ng/m(3), respectively. The calibration range of the instrument spanned 0.2-60 ng/mL. The calculated lower working range limit (LWRL) of the method for NNN was 0.126 ng/m(3), and the LWRL for NNK was 0.195 ng/m(3). The method was applied to evaluate surrogate environmental aerosols generated using smoking machines. This model is reliable but gives a large overestimation of the possible impact of THS 2.2 and e-cigarettes on indoor air, because the retention of NNN and NNK in the body of the consumers is not taken into account. As a consequence, the values reported do not reflect a real-life setting. The contents of the two target compounds in the surrogate environmental aerosols were 0.0830 +/- 0.0153 ng/m(3) of NNN and 0.0653 +/- 0.0138 ng/m(3) of NNK for THS 2.2, 0.0561 +/- 0.0296 ng/m(3) of NNN for e-cigarettes, and 0.816 +/- 0.109 ng/m(3) of NNN and 4.13 +/- 1.04 ng/m(3) NNK for cigarettes. These values correspond to 10% of the measured ETS concentration for NNN in environmental aerosols of THS 2.2 and 7% for those of e-cigarettes. For NNK, the value for the environmental aerosol of THS 2.2 was 2% of the ETS value. (C) 2018 PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Quai Jeanrenaud 5, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available