4.7 Article

Reweighting ensemble probabilities with experimental histogram data constraints using a maximum entropy principle

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 149, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5050926

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Entropy maximization methods that update a probability distribution P-0(x) to a new distribution P(x) with the use of externally known, averaged constraints find use in diverse areas. Jaynes developed a Maximum Entropy Procedure (MEP) that is an objective approach to incorporate external data to update P-0(x) to P(x). In this work, we consider the MEP in the context of external data known from a probability distribution versus that from a mean and a few higher moments. An immediate problem is that the conventional iterative Lagrange multiplier method, which relies on inverting a certain covariance matrix, is not applicable here because the covariance matrix is not invertible. We introduce an indicator function method that does not suffer from this problem. It leads to an analytic solution to this version of a MEP. As an example, a previously generated ensemble of peptide conformations used to characterize an intrinsically disordered protein is analyzed. The external constraint is on the radius of gyration probability distribution, p(RG), of this peptide. Ensemble observables such as geometric, shape characteristics, the residue end-to-end distance distribution, the all atom-pair distribution function related to the scattering intensity, the polyproline II content, and NMR (3)JHNH alpha three bond couplings are evaluated with the initial and updated ensembles. Some observables are found to be insensitive and others sensitive to the external information. An example of a 24-residue peptide, histatin 5, where an experimentally derived p(RG) is available, is also analyzed. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available