4.7 Article

Influence of chain stiffness on the dynamical heterogeneity and fragility of polymer melts

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 149, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5052153

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21833008, 21474111, 21790340]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDY-SSW-SLH027]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0703701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well accepted that stiffer polymers have higher glass transition temperatures. However, the influence of chain stiffness on the slow dynamics and dynamical heterogeneity when approaching the glass transition point is still not well understood. In this work, we investigate the influence of chain stiffness on the dynamic heterogeneity and fragility of supercooled polymer melts by using molecular dynamics simulation. The chain stiffness is tuned by varying the bending strength, and the diffusion and relaxation of polymer segments are studied. We find that the power law relation between the rescaled diffusion coefficient and the structural relaxation time does not change with changing chain stiffness, indicating similarities of glass-forming behavior of polymer melts with different chain stiffness. The dynamical heterogeneities are characterized by the non-Gaussian parameter and dynamic susceptibility, and the string-like cooperative motion is analyzed by the string-length. It is found that the non-Gaussian parameter and dynamic susceptibility characterize a different aspect of dynamical heterogeneities. Though both decreasing temperature and increasing bending strength lead to slower dynamics and growing dynamical heterogeneities, there is no simple superposition between temperature and bending strength. Our work may shed new light on the glass transition behavior of polymers with different chain stiffness. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available