4.7 Article

A sequential nanopore-channel device for polymer separation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 149, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5037449

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [2014-06091]
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we investigated whether a series of nanopores connected by channels can be used to separate polymer mixtures by molecular size. We conducted multiscale coarse-grained simulations of semiflexible polymers driven through such a device. Polymers were modelled as chains of beads near the nanopores and as single particles in the bulk of the channels. Since polymers rarely escape back into the bulk of the channels after coming sufficiently close to the nanopores, the more computationally expensive simulations near the pores were decoupled from those in the bulk. The distribution of polymer positions after many translocations was deduced mathematically from simulations across a single nanopore-channel pair, under the reasonable assumption of identical and independent dynamics in each channel and each nanopore. Our results reveal rich polymer dynamics in the nanopore-channel device and suggest that it can indeed produce polymer separation. As expected, the mean time to translocate across a single nanopore increases with the chain length. Conversely, the mean time to cross the channels from one nanopore to the next decreases with the chain length, as smaller chains explore more of the channel volume between translocations. As such, the time between translocations is a function of the length and width of the channels. Depending on the channel dimensions, polymers are sorted by increasing length, decreasing length, or non-monotonically by length such that polymers of an intermediate size emerge first. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available