4.7 Article

Robustness and Efficiency of Poisson-Boltzmann Modeling on Graphics Processing Units

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 409-420

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00761

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/NIGMS [GM093040, GM079383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poisson-Boltzmann equation (PBE) based continuum electrostatics models have been widely used in modeling electrostatic interactions in biochemical processes, particularly in estimating protein-ligand binding affinities. Fast convergence of PBE solvers is crucial in binding affinity computations as numerous snapshots need to be processed. Efforts have been reported to develop PBE solvers on graphics processing units (GPUs) for efficient modeling of biomolecules, though only relatively simple successive over-relaxation and conjugate gradient methods were implemented. However, neither convergence nor scaling properties of the two methods are optimal for large biomolecules. On the other hand, geometric multigrid (MG) has been shown to be an optimal solver on CPUs, though no MG have been reported for biomolecular applications on GPUs. This is not a surprise as it is a more complex method and depends on simpler but limited iterative methods such as Gauss-Seidel in its core relaxation procedure. The robustness and efficiency of MG on GPUs are also unclear. Here we present an implementation and a thorough analysis of MG on GPUs. Our analysis shows that robustness is a more pronounced issue than efficiency for both MG and other tested solvers when the single precision is used for complex biomolecules. We further show how to balance robustness and efficiency utilizing MG's overall efficiency and conjugate gradient's robustness, pointing to a hybrid GPU solver with a good balance of efficiency and accuracy. The new PBE solver will significantly improve the computational throughput for a range of biomolecular applications on the GPU platforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available