4.2 Article

Monte Carlo Simulations of Fluid Phase Equilibria and Interfacial Properties for Water/Alkane Mixtures: An Assessment of Nonpolarizable Water Models and of Departures from the Lorentz-Berthelot Combining Rules

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
Volume 63, Issue 11, Pages 4256-4268

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.8b00757

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abu Dhabi Petroleum Institute Research Center [LTR14009]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1152998]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monte Carlo simulations in the Gibbs ensemble were carried out to determine the mutual solubilities for water/n-alkane mixtures over a wide range of temperatures, pressures, and alkane chain lengths. Combinations of the popular, nonpolarizable SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP4P/2005 water models with the TraPPE united atom model for alkanes are explored to represent these mixtures. Significant deviations from the experimental data are observed for vapor-liquid and liquid-liquid equilibria where the errors in the predicted mole fraction often exceed a factor of 2 Utilizing a scoring metric based on the logarithmic deviation in mole fraction from experimental data, we find that the TIP4P water model outperforms the SPC/E and TIP4P/2005 models in predicting the fluid phase equilibria for water/alkane mixtures. Three models with adjusted Lennard-Jones parameters for water-alkane cross-interactions reflecting departures from the Lorentz-Berthelot combining rules are also investigated. Although a large increase in the well depth can yield a negative Gibbs free energy of transfer for water from the vapor to alkane-rich liquid phases, the overall performance appears to worsen compared to the models using the standard combining rules. Using the standard Lorentz-Berthelot combining rules, the models yield interfacial tensions that deviate by about 10% from the experimental data, but a large increase in the water-alkane cross-interactions leads to a significant underprediction of the interfacial tension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available