4.7 Article

Dexmedetomidine improves acute stress-induced liver injury in rats by regulating MKP-1, inhibiting NF-B pathway and cell apoptosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 234, Issue 8, Pages 14068-14078

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28096

Keywords

acute stress; apoptosis; dexmedetomidine; inflammation; liver injury

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [C2017022]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772806]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute stress is a frequent and unpredictable disease for many animals. Stress is widely considered to affect liver function. However, the underlying mechanism by which dexmedetomidine (DEX) attenuates acute stress-induced liver injury in rats remains unclear. In this study, we used forced swimming for 15min and acute 3-hr restraint stress model. Behavioral tests and changes in norepinephrine levels confirmed the successful establishment of the acute stress model. Acute stress-induced liver injury, evidenced by hematoxylin and eosin-stained pathological sections and increased serum aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, was reduced in DEX-treated livers. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress levels were dramatically decreased with DEX treatment compared with acute stress-induced liver injury. DEX significantly reduced acute stress-induced liver inflammation and apoptosis, as assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling staining and inflammation and apoptosis-related protein levels. DEX treatment also effectively inhibited acute stress-induced c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), P38, and BAD signaling pathway activation, and significantly induced MKP-1 activation. Thus, DEX has a protective effect on acute-stress-induced liver injury by reducing inflammation and apoptosis, which suggests a potential clinical application for DEX in stress syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available