4.5 Article

Heart Failure Differentially Modulates the Effects of Ivabradine on the Electrical Activity of the Sinoatrial Node and Pulmonary Veins

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 763-772

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.09.016

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; heart failure; ivabradine; pulmonary veins

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, Taiwan [MOST105-2314-B-016-035-MY3, MOST105-2628-B-038-012-MY3, MOST105-2314-B-038-026, MOST105-2314-B-281-004-MY2, MOST105-2314-B-038-059-MY3]
  2. Taipei Medical University Wan-Fang Hospital, Taiwan [105-swf-02, 105-wf-eva-08, 105-wf-eva-14, 106-eva-02, 106-eva-06, 106-swf-01]
  3. Cathay General Hospital, Taiwan [106CGH-TMU-04]
  4. Chi-Mei Medical Center, Taiwan [107CM-TMU-04, CMNDMC10707]
  5. Ministry of National Defense-Medical Affairs Bureau, Taiwan [MAB-106-067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Ivabradine increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Heart failure (HF) or sinoatrial node (SAN) dysfunction increases the risk of AF, and pulmonary veins (PVs) play a critical role in the pathophysiology of AF. This study investigated the electrophysiologic effects of ivabradine on SANs and PVs in a rabbit model of HF. Methods and Results: Conventional microelectrodes were used to simultaneously record the electrical activities and conduction properties of control and HF rabbit SAN-PV preparations before and after perfusion with ivabradine (0.1, 1, or 10 mon), either alone or with isoproterenol (1 Amon). HF SANs exhibited a lower beating rate than the control SANs. SAN automaticity exit blocks and SAN-PV conduction blocks were observed in 25% and 50% of samples, respectively, with P < .05 for HF SANs (n = 8) but not for control SANs (n = 6). Delayed afterdepolarization (DAD) was observed in 37.5% of HF PVs but not in control PVs. HF PVs exhibited a faster beating rate and more severe fibrosis than control PVs. Ivabradine reduced the SAN beating rates and increased the occurrences of SAN-PV conduction blocks and PV DADs in control and HF preparations. However, ivabradine induced SAN automaticity exit blocks only in HF preparations. Isoproterenol induced PV burst firing and shifting electrical conduction in control and HF preparations. A combination of isoproterenol and ivabradine (10 mon) in HF preparations resulted in the highest incidences of PV burst firing and SAN-PV electrical shifting. Conclusions: HF differentially modulates the effects of ivabradine on the electrical activities of SAN and PVs, which may increase PV arrhythmogenesis and contribute to the risk of AF in HF patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available