4.7 Article

Modification of cobalt-containing MOF-derived mesoporous carbon as an effective sulfur-loading host for rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 772, Issue -, Pages 843-851

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.103

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks; Mesoporous carbon; Acid etching; Carbon-sulfur composite; Lithium-sulfur batteries

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673131]
  2. Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province [ts201511004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016BM03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cobalt-containing metal-organic frameworks (MOF) are synthesized, then carbonized and then acid etched to obtain mesoporous carbon for its potential application as lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery cathode scaffolds. Before etching the resulting mesoporous carbon acquires a specific surface area of 206.5 m(2) g(-1) and a pore volume of 0.29 cm(3) g(-1), and in its sulfur-loading composite-1 the S-content is similar to 45.2 wt%. After etching the modified mesoporous carbon exhibits a great improvement in porosity (Surface area similar to 650.2 m(2) g(-1) and pore volume -0.77 cm(3) g(-1)) and/or in sulfur-loading amount (i. e., the S-content of composite similar to 2 - 50.0 wt%). At 0.5 C (1 C = 1675 mA g(-1)), a composite-2 cathode delivers a high discharge capacity of 925.1 mAh g(-1) in 2nd cycle and maintains a specific value of 781.1 mAh g(-1) in the 140th cycle, much higher than those of composite-1 cathode. Both of the two composite electrodes display a slight increase of electrolyte-solution resistance and surface-film resistance and an obvious decrease of chargetransfer resistance. By comparison, these resistances of composite-2 are smaller than those of composite1. This, together with the acid-modified structural parameters reasonably account for the enhanced electrochemical properties of composite-2. (C) 2018 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available