4.7 Article

Effective solution treatment can result in improved creep performance of superalloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 770, Issue -, Pages 166-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.089

Keywords

Superalloy; Solution treatment; Creep performance; Deformation mechanism; Fracture characteristics; Dislocations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50974016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we demonstrate the creep performance of a turbine disk superalloy - FGH1OOL - at 705 degrees C and 897 MPa. The effect of solution treatment and cooling rate on the microstructure, fracture and creep performance is presented in detail. The microstructure and fracture are characterized by optical microscopy (OM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results reveal that instead of air cooling (AC), after solution treatment (ST), the combination of slow and fast cooling improves the creep performance of the alloy at 705 degrees C and 897 MPa. Both during AC and the combination of slow and fast cooling, followed by ST, the creep process is dominated by the accumulation of dislocations and stacking faults, cutting through the gamma' phase. The microstructural evolution is the main cause of creep acceleration, which mainly manifests as coarsening and morphology change of the gamma' phase. Our proposed heat treatment scheme generates the serrated grain boundaries, which play a vital role in improving the creep performance. In the case of AC, the creep pores sprout and develop into wedge-shaped cracks at the trigeminal intersection of the grain boundary, while the combination of slow and fast cooling results in opening-mode cracks at the grain boundary and carbide interface. Both creep ruptures, under two different heat treatment processes, are intergranular fractures. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available