4.7 Article

Aedes aegypti Galectin Competes with Cry11Aa for Binding to ALP1 To Modulate Cry Toxicity

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 51, Pages 13435-13443

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04665

Keywords

Alkaline phosphatase; Bacillus thuringiensis; Cry 11A; Galectin; Toxicity

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [AI117808]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31472049, 31301724, 31772227]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Fuzhou [2018-G-70]
  4. Foreign Cooperative Project of Fujian Province [2018I0023]
  5. Open Project Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity [SKLPBS1838]
  6. Special Fund for Scientific and Technological Innovation of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University [CXZX2017136, CXZX2017306, CXZX2017214, KF2015064-65]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The key step for the toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (Bti) is the interaction between toxins and putative receptors; thus, many studies focus on identification of new toxin receptors and engineering of toxins with higher affinity/specificity for receptors. In the larvae of Aedes aegypti, galectin-14 was one of the genes upregulated by Bti treatment. RNAi knockdown expression of galectin-14 and feeding recombinant galectin-14-thioredoxin fusion protein significantly affected survival of Ae. aegypti larvae treated with Bti toxins. Recombinant galectin-14 protein bound to brush border membrane vesicles (BBMVs) of Ae. aegypti larvae, ALP1 and APN2, and galectin-14 and Cry11Aa bound to BBMVs with a similarly high affinity. Competitive binding results showed that galectin-14 competed with Cry11Aa for binding to BBMVs and ALP1 to prevent effective binding of toxin to receptors. These novel findings demonstrated that midgut proteins other than receptors play an important role in modulating the toxicity of Cry toxins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available