4.7 Article

Seasonality in bipolar disorder: Effect of sex and age

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 322-326

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.073

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; Seasonal variation; Seasons; Sex characteristics; Age; Hospitalization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mood episodes in bipolar disorder (BD) are reported to exhibit a seasonal pattern (SP). However, it is unclear whether this pattern is influenced by a patient's sex and age. Methods: In this nationwide registry study, we examined all inpatient treatments due to a manic (F31.0-2), depressive (F31.3-5) or mixed (F31.6) BD-episode in Austria for 2001-2014. Calculations were based on directly age-standardized rates and seasonality was analyzed on a monthly basis. Results: The database comprised 60,607 admissions (35.8% men). SP were shown for women during manic (summer-autumn), depressive (winter) and mixed (summer) episodes, for men only during manic (summer) episodes. However, no significant sex differences (manic p = 0.101, depressive p = 0.295, mixed p = 0.622 episode) were found. Women at young age (15-35 years) seemed to be more vulnerable to a SP in manic and mixed episodes. Limitations: Only aggregated patient data of inpatient treatments and no single case histories were available. Conclusions: In this nationwide registry study, a distinct SP could be shown for manic episodes in men and women, as well as a SP for depressive and mixed episodes in women. As no significant difference in any BD-subgroup could be observed, the effect of sex on the SP seems to be small, if existing at all. However, when taking age into account, we observed a higher likelihood for a SP in young women. Single case studies with information on possible further influencing factors (e.g. medication use) might help to clarify the impact of sex and age on SP in more detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available